Back


  • Free newsletters - Wealth Advisor, Breaking News and More
  • Earn Free CE Credits
  • Free Seminars and Podcasts from Industry Experts
  • Access our Discussion Boards

Baird Reels In Branch Managers

By Helen Kearney, On Wall Street
February 1, 2010
¦
Advertisement

Milwaukee-based Baird Private Wealth Management continues to sweep up unhappy wirehouse branch managers.

The firm announced today that it had recruited Dennis Rowland, who spent over 16 years at Smith Barney and was the branch manager for the firm’s St. Paul and Duluth, Minn., offices. In that role, he oversaw 29 advisors generating a combined $14 million in revenue.

At Baird, Rowland will be in charge of establishing a new branch in St Paul, Minn. He will be a producing branch manager.

“With his deep industry knowledge and appreciation for Baird’s unique culture, (Rowland) is well suited to recruit other talented and committed financial professionals and expand the firm’s presence in the Twin Cities,” said Erik Dahlberg, a regional director for Baird. Baird currently has two other offices in the Twin Cities area.

Wirehouse branch managers have faced big challenges over the past year, as major firms continue the shift to a complex management system, with one manager overseeing multiple branches. This has forced some former branch managers back into production.

Are regional firms a good option for disaffected branch managers?

Postby Community Manager >> Mon Feb 01, 2010 1:20 pm

Are regional firms a good option for disaffected branch managers?

Community Manager
Joined:
Thu Nov 13, 2008 10:30 am
Postby buster jiggs >> Mon Feb 01, 2010 2:04 pm

I think that most ex-branch managers coming from the major wirehouse will find the change is more a culture change than anything else. Most will embrace the change.

buster jiggs
Joined:
Tue Dec 01, 2009 11:44 am
Postby Tag1 >> Mon Feb 01, 2010 3:26 pm

Branch managers and smaller producers are being squeezed out in this post-consolidation period. We see many folks looking for another home that has the same "look and feel" as the one that they "joined" but not the one they are with now. Smaller regional firms have a great family-feel, but may not be in a position to offer a compelling deal to entice the quality folks that are looking. It all comes down to fit and due diligence. There is a site that offers market color on most of the hiring firms as well as transition advice. www.DealMentors.com is free and confidential. You don't need to log in or anything. Good luck to all who are looking!

Tag1
Joined:
Thu Jan 28, 2010 9:23 am
Postby buster jiggs >> Mon Feb 01, 2010 6:05 pm

Most brokers that were going to move have moved. Some moved for the money, (whored themselfs) with no regard to their clients. Others looked for a firm that would not have to explain or appoligize to the client why they were jumping from 1 wirehouse , to another with the SAME track record. Most regionals didn't take TARP money, the ones that did more than likely won't be around at the next "burst of the bubble(s)". The brokers that have stayed put are reaping the rewards of not moving picking up the clients that did not move with a broker that jumped ship(probaly cause he inherited)and taking a chance of loosing clients plus get a "retention pkg." for not jumping ship! And some are just toooooo lazy to make a move. There are still some that need to move and do it sooner than later, the 300K broker with LOS 7 are in fair shape now but maybe not in 2012! Two kind of brokers are moving 1 the $MM producer (for the money) and the lower end producer 300K and below co's they can't make a living on 25% commission. But the regionals can still make a profit with this level of production.

buster jiggs
Joined:
Tue Dec 01, 2009 11:44 am
Click to read all comments (4)
Advertisement